News.
This
website is continuously under construction and will be adapted accordingly..
By clicking on the british flagg one arrives at the
english pages.
They are numbered from 100 upwards.
Comments can be posted at info@milieuziektes.nl
********************
Personal advice for meters (23-09-2007)
Info | SBM-2008 | Building Biology house investigation | Literature | Alternativ | Links | Contact |
03-09-2010 Testing of electrosensitivity
I have been told, that some bozo's overhere are reflecting on methods to test the electrosensitivity on persons. But many such persons do not know how and why electrosensitives may *tick*
Quite a number of such tests have fallen through, because the persons who designed those tests, did not understand what electrosensitivity implies and how persons do react.
People do not react like lamps.
Although I am nick-named as the *bucket-man*, I would like to explain my viewpoints in simple language.
Assume the following:
The condition of the immune system could be expressed as having a bucket in your belly.
Slowly it will be filled with
negative stuff.
In figure 2 the bucket has been filled till to nearly the threshold.
The immune system is already considerably damaged, but the critical threshold is not reached yet.
The *filling* of the bucket can contain a large diversity of factors, which may be even have nothing to do with elektrosmog.
At 200 to 2.000 uW/m² the last level can raise to the treshold.
These values are for high frequency radiation, but low frequency sources may claim their toll..
In figure 3 the critical threshold is reached (the red is elektrosmog).
Every drop added may cause an explosion.
And with the aforementioned exposures, one could have become electrosesnsitive. .
The other colours in the bucket represent other loads on the immune system, like poison, heavy metalsonverwe, uncoped trauma's, medications, worms, virusses and bacteria, etc.
In figure 6 a *normal* person will be charges with the same load, which may cause an electrosensitive to blow the roof, like in figure 4.
However, the*normal* person has no reason for reacting. For that a much higher load is necessary.
Most studies about electrosensitivity are therefore pure nonsense, because normal persons cannot react at loads on which electrosensitives may react heavily.
An electrosensitive can attain from condition 4 again to condition 3, and even when a repair of the immune system is succesful, the condition of figure 7 may be reached.
It may be clear , that for testing electrosensitives, it is important, that before the test they must have the condion according figure 3.
They should be staying just below the threshold of the blue line, and for the same sort of elektrosmog source. Because they may react quite differently for another sort of source.
Many electrosensitives do react different or even not on for instance different sources like GSM, DECT, TETRA, WLAN, 5.8 GHz, *dirty air*, magnetic fields,etc.
Electrosensitives do react to very small amounts of elektrosmog.
It is therefore ridiculous in involving a control group, because they cannot react at all.
(If they still do anyhow, than they were not *normal*, but electrosensitive, without knowing it, like with so many people.)
Of course it would be marvelous, if electrosensitivity was proven scientifically, but than it must be good and correct..
But a clumsy study, where it is only proven that electrosensitives do not react to sources, we do not need..
Kaul, Rubin and Frick made also principal mistakes..
