Many people walk against brick walls with their complaints, they are not understood, and advised to see a psychiatrist.
The sussing words of our authorities have proved not to be trustworthy and do not help in improving the situation of the still more aggravating and ill becoming people.
Like asbestos, DDT, tobacco, woodimpregnating, X-ray radiation, softenon, etc. which for years could not harm our health, has proven ill advice and the contrary has been established.
Every cigarette
package says: "Smoking is deadly", although there is no scientific
proof for that.
Thousands of cows, pigs, chicken and other beasts have been killed, although
there was noscientific proof, that they were all cantaminated.
That was all done according the Precaution principle.
That is correct.
But for influemces of the environment the authorities refuse to apply this Precautinary principle, and are 16 milion dutch people unvoluntarily guinea pigs.
I do know from
many sources how devastating that can be.
About that I do know a lot.
But you can bet, that our authorities know a lot more.
They do know also
those sources, they are on the internet and they read all that too.
Research
Our *Gezondheidsraad* does only research on literature, and all their advises and verdicts are solely based on that. They advise the government, and everybody hides behind them.
A new drug may
come on the market only after 10-20 years of research.
But a damaging technique like f.i. UMTS may be put on the market without any
prelimilary research.
(I hear already alarming messages from germany)
And all those researchers of chronical weariness, chronical headache, depression, heart rhythm disturbances, forgetfulnessand more, refuse to look after environmental influences.
There is not one environmental organisation in Nederland who will look into environmental influences.
In germany there
are 12.000 Burgeriniative. In the Netherlands not one!
Not that we have something to protest against.
It is our intention that people start realising what they are doing.
That they realise, that such a wireless home phone according to DECT is a
real *Health Killer*.
And there are so many more points.
We want that everybody asks himself what the real reason may be for all those unaccountable and unexplanable diseases and complaints, where the traditional medicine cannot find a cause.
The politicians
in the Hague were all asleep, when they gave the providers a carte blanche
for placing the antennas where they want. They multiply each day, and they
grow also (on top).
(All members of parliament have received *het bitje* of july 2002; not one
reaction. With that they were informed, that with the use of UMTS about 60
% of the population would be seriously ill!)
I have send it personally to the prime minister and to the state secretary,
but they put it aside.
The dirty air and everything connected to it (like fine matter) will officially not be handled correctly. Somebody giving a ticket, because he drove an overspeed of 2 km/h too fast has nothing to do with the environment.
Only people going for instance to France on holiday come back with unbelievable stories about clear skies at night full of stars!
People in Rotterdam do not believe that. When they look up, they do not see anything.
I want to thank
the GGD in Groningen.
They distribute excellent and understandable documentation on a number of
harmful elements like formaldehyde or radon gas. It is only in dutch.
Results of researches.
Yes, you would say, all those reports do not show anything harmful?
And that is a
misconception. Our government does not order research. The only ones that
do research is the telecom industry.
They pay and thus they have a great say in the results. With their orders
they already command what they want researched. They only want reports showing
the harmlessnes.
When negative outcomes are reported, those scientific research reports are
not allowed to be published, and as such they do not count.
And if such a report happended being published, a peer-to-peer research has
to be taken.
However, nobody wants to pay for an investigation, where it is known from
the beginning, that the results will be the same. Therefore they change with
such investigations a number of parameters, with the putcome of different
results.
So they look a whole winter in a cornfield for strawberries, and none were found. A peer-to-peer investigation will be done during the summer. And also then, no strawberries were found in the cornfield. The researchers concluded that strawberries therefore cannot exist.
This may look ridiculous, but in the same way research in mobile phones has been done. The TNO Cofam investigation had also the starting point of establishing the harmlessnes. The results were disappointing for them, because they found something.
The german Ecolog
Institute got an order from a telecom company to investigate, but it was strictly
forbidden to look after a-thermical effects.They got around that by defining
the area as micro-effects.
Their Report was hidden under the table for over a year, but then the people
at Ecolog exploded and they placed the Report on the internet.
Many researchreports which showed something have disappeared. And critical scientists have been threatened and sabotaged in their work. There is a long list of good critical scientists, with yearlong experience in this field, who have been made working impossible.
The telecom industry
continues on, like the asbestos and tobacco industry, bagatellising the dangers
of mobile phones.
There are so many reports with strong indications of the dangers, but nobody
wants to pay for an investigation, in which the proof is definitive.
Politicians are under the strings of the industry. The book*Mobilfunk, ein
Freilandversuch am Menschen* is very illustrative about that. There is no
reason, why that is different in other countries.
UMTS is damaging
to health. TNO has proved that. UMTS is a lost case.
Technically it is overtaken, too expensive and too slow. There is no market
for it. There is no so-called *killer-application*.
It is the government who pushes on and on. They demand 70% coverage in 2007
overhere..
This is also the opinion of
Paul Smits, oud-topman van KPN.
Minister Brinkhorst
sees no reason for pausing the installment of UMTS.
The TNO Rapport already shows all reasons for applying the Precautionary
principle.
It is a question how the minister justifies this with his conscience.
He also has received *het bitje* juli 2002, in which the warning is implicated
that with the use of the UMTS network ca 60 % of the population will be seriously
ill!
Also prime minister Balkenende and secretary van Geel have received this personally.
But they just look aside.
It sounds very hypocrite for fining people for speeding 2 km/h too fast, to
place zones of 80 km/h on motorways, the mouth full of Kyoto, but for this
environmental disaster, that slowly kills people, animals and plants, to do
nothing against it.
Of course it is a wonderful excuse for handling the *grey people* and* the
weak* in the society, without anybody accusing the sore point.
One starts wondering about that, and stuff like the New World Order.
Info | SBM-2003 | Building Biology house investigation | Literature | Alternativ | Links | Contact |